Common Ground Coaching

You know the feeling.

Your phone lights up and it’s someone you haven’t heard from in months. Maybe longer. And before you’ve even finished reading the message, something in you already knows. There’s a ask coming. A favor. A need. Something they want that they’ve calculated you might be willing to give.

And maybe you give it. Because you’re a generous person. Because you want to be helpful. Because part of you is just glad they reached out, even if you know, somewhere underneath the warmth of being contacted, that the silence will return the moment the need is met.

This is one of the quieter disappointments of adult life, the people who treat relationships like vending machines. Who appear when they’re running low on something and disappear once they’ve been refilled. Who know just enough about you to know what you’ll give, and who have learned, through experience, that you’ll give it.

Understanding why this happens (and what it says about both of you) is worth more than the frustration of recognizing the pattern.

What this kind of relationship actually is

There’s a clinical term for people who consistently use relationships transactionally — who connect only when there’s something to extract and withdraw once the extraction is complete. But most of the people who do this aren’t diagnosable. They’re just people who, for a variety of reasons, never developed the capacity for genuine reciprocal connection.

Reciprocal connection requires something most people take for granted: the ability to show up for someone when you have nothing to gain. To check in without an agenda. To be present in someone’s life not because they can give you something but because you value them, their existence, their experience, their inner world.

Some people never learned how to do this. Not because they’re evil, but because the relationships they grew up in were themselves transactional. Love and attention were contingent, given when earned, withheld when not useful. They learned, at a foundational level, that connection is a resource to be extracted, not a relationship to be tended.

So that’s what they do. Not always consciously. Not always with bad intent. But consistently, in a pattern that reveals itself over time to everyone around them except, often, themselves.

The different types

Not all selective showers-up are the same. It’s worth knowing the distinction because the appropriate response differs.

The unconsciously transactional. These are people who genuinely don’t notice the pattern. They’re not calculating, they just haven’t developed the habit of maintaining connection without a purpose. They reach out when they need something not because they’re using you but because need is the only thing that reminds them to reach out at all. They would be genuinely surprised to learn how the pattern lands.

The consciously opportunistic. These people know what they’re doing. They’ve made a quiet calculation about what you’ll provide, how often they can access it, and how little maintenance is required to keep you available. They are not your friends. They are people who have found you useful.

The fair-weather friend. Present in the good times, absent in the hard ones. Not asking for anything necessarily, just unwilling to be in the room when the room is difficult. They show up when things are fun and disappear when you actually need someone. The relationship has warmth but no depth, and the warmth evaporates the moment it requires effort.

The crisis caller. Only contacts you when something has gone wrong in their life. Your relationship exists in their emergencies. Outside of crisis, you don’t exist to them, or rather, you exist only as a resource they’ll need again eventually and therefore keep at a distance that feels like connection but functions like storage.

Why you keep responding

Here’s the part that’s worth examining honestly…. not to assign blame, but because this is where the actual work lives.

If someone has shown up transactionally in your life multiple times and you keep responding as if this time will be different, that’s worth getting curious about.

Sometimes it’s simple generosity. You’re a giving person and you extend that generosity even to people who have demonstrated they won’t return it. That’s not a flaw…. but unchecked, it becomes a pattern of pouring into people who have no intention of pouring back.

Sometimes it’s hope. You remember who they were or who you thought they were, and you keep responding to that version even as the current version keeps showing you something different. You’re loyal to a potential that has never materialized.

Sometimes it’s your own unmet need, for connection, for being needed, for feeling valued. Someone reaching out, even transactionally, meets something in you. The contact feels like proof that you matter to them. And maybe in some limited way you do, you matter as a resource. But you deserve to matter as a person, and those are not the same thing.

And sometimes (if you’re honest) it’s fear. Fear that if you stop being useful, you’ll be left with nothing. That the transactional connection is better than no connection. That setting a limit means losing the relationship entirely, and even a hollow relationship feels safer than the empty space it would leave.

None of these are shameful. All of them are worth knowing.

What it costs you

Beyond the obvious frustration, the draining relationships have a cost that compounds over time.

Every hour you spend showing up for someone who won’t show up back is an hour not spent on relationships that are genuinely mutual. Every emotional resource you pour into a transactional connection is a resource not available for the people who would actually use it, not to extract from you, but to meet you.

There’s also an internal cost. When you consistently give to people who take without reciprocating, you train yourself to expect that dynamic. You normalize feeling undervalued. You adjust your expectations downward until you stop being surprised by people who use you, and start being surprised when someone doesn’t.

That’s not growth. That’s erosion. And it happens so gradually that most people don’t notice until they’re already hollowed out by it.

What to do with them

This is not about cutting everyone who has ever asked for a favor out of your life. Humans legitimately need each other and asking for help is not a character flaw.

The question is whether the relationship is exclusively extractive, whether the only time this person appears is when they need something, whether they’ve ever shown up for you without an agenda, whether there is any genuine mutuality underneath the surface.

If there isn’t…. you have a few honest options.

Name it, once. Not as an accusation, but as information. “I’ve noticed we mostly connect when you need something. I’d like us to actually be in each other’s lives.” See what they do with that. Some people genuinely don’t know. Some people will hear it and change. Some people will apologize and then do it again.

Stop making yourself so available. You don’t have to announce this. You just have to do it. Respond more slowly. Say no sometimes. Let some asks go unanswered. Watch what happens to the relationship when it’s not being maintained entirely by your availability. What you find will tell you everything.

Let the distance be real. Some relationships need to be allowed to become what they actually are, distant. Not dramatic, not hostile, just honest. You don’t have to make a speech. You just have to stop working so hard to keep alive something that the other person isn’t working to maintain at all.

Redirect the energy. Every unit of effort you currently spend responding to transactional people could be directed toward the relationships in your life that are genuinely mutual. The people who check in without needing something. Who remember the things you told them. Who show up when things are hard. Water those relationships. They are the ones that will actually sustain you.

What this reveals about what you deserve

Underneath the frustration of recognizing transactional relationships is often a quieter question: why do I keep accepting this?

Because on some level, you do accept it. Every time you respond to the need and absorb the subsequent silence. Every time you show up for someone who doesn’t show up back and tell yourself that’s just how they are.

The acceptance isn’t weakness. But it is information, about what you believe you deserve, about what you’ve come to expect from the people in your life, about whether you’ve internalized the belief that your value to others is in what you provide rather than who you are.

You deserve to be in someone’s life when you’re not useful. You deserve to be contacted when nothing is needed. You deserve relationships where you are the point, not the resource.

That’s not a high bar. It’s the basic bar. And if it feels like too much to ask, that’s the thing worth examining, not the behavior of the people who keep calling only when they need something.

The relationship worth protecting

Not everyone in your life will be a fair-weather friend or a crisis caller or a quiet extractor. Some people will show up, not just when they need something, but when you do. Not just in the easy moments, but in the hard ones. Not because you’re useful to them but because you matter to them.

Those relationships are worth protecting with the energy you free up when you stop pouring endlessly into the ones that only flow one way.

The people who show up for you when they have nothing to gain, those are your people. You’ll know them because they’re still there when you have nothing to give.

---

You are not a vending machine. You are a person. The people worth keeping in your life know the difference.